Fastest Phenom quad core beaten by slowest Core 2 Quad

    Date: 11/19/07 (Computer Geeks)    Keywords: php, software, html, asp, web

    When quad-cores collide: AMD Phenom vs Intel Core 2 Quad
    http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=10427

    "We can debate all day whether the majority of consumer software is threaded enough to take advantage of four execution cores, but the immutable fact remains that AMD's fastest quad-core offering is slower than Intel's slowest..."

    "...AMD's nascent Phenom also suffers under the considerable yoke of Intel's Core 2 Quad 6600 pricing, which at £165 for a hugely-overclockable 2.4GHz part is something of a bargain. AMD, though, is pitching its slightly underperforming quad-core part at roughly the same price."


    AMD's Phenom Unveiled: A Somber Farewell to K8
    http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=3153&p=1
    The problem is, and I hate to ruin the surprise here, Phenom isn't faster than Intel's Core 2 Quad clock for clock. In other words, a 2.3GHz Phenom 9600 will set you back at least $283 and it's slower than a 2.4Ghz Core 2 Quad Q6600, which will only cost you $269.


    Phenom 13.5% Slower Than Intel's Q6600
    http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/11/19/the_spider_weaves_its_web/page22.html

    It's really not a close fight between AMD and Intel at this point. "Steamroll" would be an apt description of the situation.

    Source: http://community.livejournal.com/computergeeks/1127705.html

« PC Surveillance at work || Is this legal? »


antivirus | apache | asp | blogging | browser | bugtracking | cms | crm | css | database | ebay | ecommerce | google | hosting | html | java | jsp | linux | microsoft | mysql | offshore | offshoring | oscommerce | php | postgresql | programming | rss | security | seo | shopping | software | spam | spyware | sql | technology | templates | tracker | virus | web | xml | yahoo | home