Was OSI right to let Microsoft licenses in?

    Date: 10/17/07 (Open Source)    Keywords: microsoft

    Both clauses are meant mainly to protect Microsoft's interests, as opposed to the licensee's interests. Microsoft doesn't want you trying to make a profit by adding your stuff to its stuff. This ain't your daddy's BSD, in other words.

    Source: http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zdnet/open-source/~3/170941435/

« Can OpenSolaris become an... || The great fraud of our time »


antivirus | apache | asp | blogging | browser | bugtracking | cms | crm | css | database | ebay | ecommerce | google | hosting | html | java | jsp | linux | microsoft | mysql | offshore | offshoring | oscommerce | php | postgresql | programming | rss | security | seo | shopping | software | spam | spyware | sql | technology | templates | tracker | virus | web | xml | yahoo | home