That’s a no, then, on utilization?

    Date: 05/26/05 (Open Source)    Keywords: no keywords

    I don't want to imply that there isn't an argument to be made for getting server utilization up; there is, but its not always appropriate and, where it is, neither virtualization nor partitioning are likely to be the right way to do it.

    Source: http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=295&part=rss&tag=feed&subj=zdblog

« Is service the answer to... || What Linux really means for... »


antivirus | apache | asp | blogging | browser | bugtracking | cms | crm | css | database | ebay | ecommerce | google | hosting | html | java | jsp | linux | microsoft | mysql | offshore | offshoring | oscommerce | php | postgresql | programming | rss | security | seo | shopping | software | spam | spyware | sql | technology | templates | tracker | virus | web | xml | yahoo | home