Nature says Wikipedia is not that bad

    Date: 12/15/05 (Open Source)    Keywords: no keywords

    Would any of Wikipedia's critics publish the criticism in as detailed and factual a way as Wikipedia has?

    Source: http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=525&part=rss&tag=feed&subj=zdblog

« The academy vs. open source || Bruce Perens' crystal ball... »
Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites  • 
antivirus | apache | asp | blogging | browser | bugtracking | cms | crm | css | database | ebay | ecommerce | google | hosting | html | java | jsp | linux | microsoft | mysql | offshore | offshoring | oscommerce | php | postgresql | programming | rss | security | seo | shopping | software | spam | spyware | sql | technology | templates | tracker | virus | web | xml | yahoo | home