RFC: Tables vs CSS vs CSS enhanced tables

    Date: 08/08/06 (Web Development)    Keywords: templates, browser, css

        Now don't get me wrong, I love CSS but the positioning system implemented by MSIE/Mozilla/Safari have their slight differences that can ultimately make it difficult to work with.  Sure there's plenty of little hacks and such to work around them, but it looks pretty bad to the clients when my work renders wrong on obsolete browsers.   So I've gone back to using tables to lock elements in place, then using CSS to beautify them.  I still keep my templates below 10k in size and all appears to be good?

    Source: http://community.livejournal.com/webdev/342476.html

« Firefox issues || Alternate/dual directory... »


antivirus | apache | asp | blogging | browser | bugtracking | cms | crm | css | database | ebay | ecommerce | google | hosting | html | java | jsp | linux | microsoft | mysql | offshore | offshoring | oscommerce | php | postgresql | programming | rss | security | seo | shopping | software | spam | spyware | sql | technology | templates | tracker | virus | web | xml | yahoo | home